Ovaries in females and testicles in males are reproductive organs, or gonads, that maintain health of their respective systems. They also function as glands because they produce and release hormones. Scientists believe environmental factors likely play a role in some reproductive disorders. Research shows exposure to environmental factors could affect reproductive health in the following ways:.
NIEHS conducts and funds research to understand environmental factors that may affect human reproductive health. Heavy lifting or shift work and decreased fertility — Two occupational factors for women — lifting heavy loads or working non-daytime schedules — are associated with fewer eggs in their ovaries, which could indicate decreased fertility.
Chemical exposure and assisted reproductive technology — Exposure to high levels of flame retardants 6 and plasticizers 7 may have a negative impact on the outcomes of in vitro fertilization IVF , a technology used to help people get pregnant. The researchers found that women with higher levels of these chemicals in their urine had lower levels of ovary cells necessary for reproduction, and fewer successful pregnancies and live births.
Chemical exposure and fetal growth — Exposure during pregnancy to phthalates 8 and phenols 9 , chemicals commonly found in plastics, as well as arsenic , a naturally occurring chemical found in food, air, soil, and water, could lead to low birth weight 10 , early onset of puberty, and obesity. West Coast for the first time. Conference highlights were shared on twitter at IBPAdvocacy. Key ingredients for success included: enabling stakeholders to identify their own needs and priorities, demystifying advocacy, and building their capacity to advocate for and lead these priorities.
The strategic location of this meeting also allowed IBP to directly engage west coast donors in the dialogue around these pressing issues. They discussed how advocacy is used to create an enabling environment which provides enough resources to expand access, use and quality of family planning and thereby contributes to sustainability and scale-up.
The guidelines were updated and a strength rating for each recommendation was included that was based either on a systematic review of the literature or consensus opinion from the expert panel, where applicable. Evidence synthesis: The male partner in infertile couples should undergo a comprehensive urological assessment to identify and treat any modifiable risk factors causing fertility impairment. Infertile men are at a higher risk of harbouring and developing other diseases including malignancy and cardiovascular disease and should be screened for potential modifiable risk factors, such as hypogonadism.
Sperm DNA fragmentation testing has emerged as a novel biomarker that can identify infertile men and provide information on the outcomes from assisted reproductive techniques. A general website policy which references "visitor" or "user" personal information will not suffice. A policy that refers to donor information collected on the website is also not sufficient as the policy must be comprehensive and applicable to both online and offline donors.
The existence of a privacy policy of any type does not prohibit the charity itself from contacting the donor for informational, educational, or solicitation purposes. Charity Navigator looks to confirm on the Form , or for some metrics on the charity's website, that the organization makes this information easily accessible. This chart displays the trend of revenue and expenses over the past several years for this organization, as reported on their IRS Form Presented here are this organizations key compensated staff members as identified by our analysts.
This compensation data includes salary, cash bonuses and expense accounts and is displayed exactly how it is reported to the IRS. The amounts do not include nontaxable benefits, deferred compensation, or other amounts not reported on Form W In some cases, these amounts may include compensation from related organizations. Read the IRS policies for compensation reporting. Organization which receives a substantial part of its support from a governmental unit or the general public b 1 A vi BMF foundation code: Independent - the organization is an independent organization or an independent auxiliary i.
BMF affiliation code: 3. The Form is a document that nonprofit organizations file with the IRS annually. We leverage finance and accountability data from it to form Encompass ratings. Click here to view this organization's Forms on the IRS website if any are available.
This score estimates the actual impact a nonprofit has on the lives of those it serves, and determines whether it is making good use of donor resources to achieve that impact.
Note: The absence of a score does not indicate a positive or negative assessment, it only indicates that we have not yet evaluated the organization. Note: The absence of a score does not indicate a positive or negative assessment, it only indicates that the organization has not yet submitted data for evaluation.
This score provides an assessment of the organization's engagement with the constituents it serves, a practice we term Constituent Feedback. When organizations listen to constituents, they are able to better deliver on programs and meet the needs of stakeholders.
A future version of this Beacon will also assess an organization's people operations and its Diversity, Equity and Inclusion DEI metrics. Nonprofit organizations are encouraged to fill out the How We Listen section of their Candid profile. Constituent Feedback and Listening Practice data are not available for this organization. Charity Navigator believes nonprofit organizations that engage in inclusive practices, such as collecting feedback from the people and communities they serve, may be more effective.
We award every nonprofit that completes the Candid survey full credit for this Beacon, in recognition of their willingness to publicly share this information with the nonprofit and philanthropic communities.
Although the data is not evaluated for quality at this time, future iterations of this Beacon will include third party or other data that will serve to validate the information provided by the nonprofit. Our partnership with Feedback Labs and Guidestar by Candid , and other partners including Fund for Shared Insight, GlobalGiving, and Keystone Accountability, enables us to launch the first version of this beacon with Constituent Feedback information collected on Candid's site.
Feedback practices have been shown to support better Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion outcomes, an essential area of assessment that we intend to further expand and develop in the future.
Feedback Labs has documented several studies which indicate that beyond achieving organizational goals, nonprofits that are attentive and responsive to concerns and ideas raised by beneficiaries establish stronger relationships with the people they serve, promote greater equity, and empower constituents in ways that can help to ensure better long-term outcomes.
You can find resources to help nonprofits improve their feedback practices here. The Giving Basket is having some issues. If you wish to donate, please refresh the page. Your donation attempt encountered a problem. Please refresh the page to try again.
You're faster than our page! Give the page a little longer to finish loading and try your donation again. National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health. You are viewing this organization's new Charity Navigator profile page. To view the legacy version, click here.
Star Rated Report. Financial Performance Metrics. Fundraising Expenses. Fundraising Efficiency. Working Capital Ratio. Program Expense Growth. Liabilities to Assets.
Program Expense. Program Expense Ratio Administrative Expenses Fundraising Expenses
0コメント